Thursday, 12 June 2025

Katharine Carnegie, Viscountess Tredegar: 1867-1949

 



A Short Tribute to Katharine Carnegie                      

      Viscountess Tredegar : 1867-1949                                     

                                By William Cross, FSA Scot 

In 1913, on the death of Godfrey, the 2nd Lord Tredegar,  his nephew,   Courtenay Morgan, succeeded to the title.  Godfrey  never married  and an assorted mix of his  sisters and their daughters acted as hostesses at Tredegar House. 

On  Courtenay's succession,  his  marriage of  thirteen years  to  Lady Katharine Carnegie was in difficulty.  Katharine hated Wales and Courtenay.  All attempts made  of them  trying to live together had failed.

Newport had not seen a Lady Tredegar since the death of the first baroness,  Lady Rosamond Mundy,  almost thirty years before,  in 1883.

Courtenay was obliged  to play for time to explain  the absence of Katharine from his side.

However he persuaded the local newspaper, the "South Wales Argus" , to publish a sketch of Katharine, as below, dated 1907.



                                     Katharine in 1907

The Daily Mail  of 22 November, 1913 recorded:

“Lord Tredegar announced at Newport yesterday that Lady Tredegar’s doctor would not allow her to take part in any public functions at present”.

Katharine  absence from Courtenay’s side,   Tredegar House and Wales  remained   perpetual. 

It was all different in 1890 when  Major Courtenay Morgan married Lady Katharine Agnes Blanche Carnegie in the library of Kinnaird Castle in Scotland. 


                                     Kinnaird Castle
                               The seat of the Carnegies

Everyone expected a happy marriage, but it was never happy,  Katharine and Courtenay were not suited and dysfunctional.

But they had two children, a son, Evan born 1893 and a daughter, Gwyneth, born 1895.

As 1913  finally  closed the whole of Courtenay’s family, Katharine, son Evan and daughter Gwyneth were in London for Christmas and New Year.   A fire at Tredegar House had caused damage to several bedrooms in the servant’s quarters forced Courtenay’s return to Wales.[1]


                            Tredegar House, Newport

In January 1915, Katharine roped  Gwyneth ( in her second year as a debutante )  into acting as a companion at a matinee held at the Alhambra Theatre  in aid of Grand Duke Michael’s  Fund for sending comforts to the British soldiers in France.[2]


    

                                                       Gwyneth Morgan                                 

An adjoining report records “   Although at present in London, and very much an invalid, Lady Tredegar takes a keen interest in the various movements in Wales which have been set on foot either for supplying the needs of Welsh regiments or assisting local distress.” [3]

A poor sleeper, susceptible to noise and uncomfortable in London’s  war time  chaos, Katharine was house  hunting – she bought a refuge,   Honeywood House,  that later  this became her main home, at Rowhook, near  Dorking.

During the war period, and despite her  health being wobbly she tried hard to keep a presence in London  during the summer months. 


                                          Honeywood House, Rowhook

In the early months of being Lord and Lady Tredegar  they took a lease on St Dunstan’s Lodge, Regents Park.[4] It proved impossible for Katharine  to continue living at the spacious  Lodge,  with its ample grounds, because “ roarings from the Zoo [ London Zoo] woke Lady Tredegar....” every morning. [5]  Perhaps it was more to do with  Courtenay’s pawings than the creatures over the wall.[6]

At the outbreak of the Great War, Courtenay offered his steam yacht Liberty to the War Office, this was accepted, the ship was revamped as a hospital ship ( at Courtenay’s own expense) and he went off to sail in her – seeing early action in the North Sea.


SS Liberty

Katharine was unwell but keen to contribute something useful too. She wrote a letter  expressing her great regret that her health would not allow her to take an active part in the good work which the various branches of the Red Cross Society were  doing in Monmouthshire, and informing the Society that she would send a cheque for £100 to the Bassaleg St Basil’s Working Guild Red Cross Committee aid of the County’s Central Red Cross Society.[7]

While  Britain was still at war  Katharine  continued to support the war effort in several ways. She gave up her home at Bryanston Square as a war hospital for the  Royal Flying Corps, writing cheques to fund its upkeep.

In the summer of 1917 her  efforts were recognised by the Prime Minister David Lloyd George and his wife  who invited Katharine to 10 Downing Street for a visit there by Princess Mary ( only daughter of  the King and  Queen). Katharine took Evan with her “ as fetcher and carrier for the Princess”. [8] The event was a concert of  Welsh music, much enjoyed by all and proved  a successful fund raiser.

                                        Evan Morgan

One report says “ [ The Princess ] was sitting in her favourite pink and white, between Mrs Lloyd George and Lady Tredegar ....”[9]

                            Katharine by Augustus John

Welsh artist, Augustus John informed London and Wales of Katharine’s looks and fashions when he painted her and  subsequently  displayed his  “Lady Tredegar”  in an exhibition at the Alpine Club, along with a portrait of Lady Cynthia Asquith and   an early versions of his series  “Tinkers” ( on Gipsies)  that   John ranked amongst his  own best work of the period.[10]  Katharine was also painted by Ambrose McEvoy  and exhibited at in the year that followed.[11]  

                             Katharine by Ambrose McEvoy


An anonymous ‘ Portrait of a Young Man ‘ in the  same exhibition was of Evan Morgan.[12]



                            Evan Morgan By Augustus John


Katharine also facilitated a  war time charity appeals  for the Royal Flying Corps  - one of these in March 1918  was a  matinee concert   at the Coliseum[13] and a month later by staging a vocal  recital by Boris Lensky  at her home at 45 Grosvenor Square on Saturday  13 April, 1918. [14]

Katharine’s patronage of the arts and young up and coming artists was another passion of hers through the early 1920s including  Wyndham Lewis is  reflected in her appearances at galleries and exhibitions.[15]    Two years before she was among those who supported an exhibition of American  contemporary art at the Grafton Gallaries. It was during this time that Katharine gained a lady’s companion,  Miss Mackenzie.[16]

There was always a need for a new hat. Katharine was among a number of Society women to  have   Nellie Romilly, a family connection by marriage,  supplied  the said head ware.

In 1926, the year that Courtenay became a Viscount and Katharine Viscountess Tredegar she remained active in artistic circles with a a pledge of support by Viscountess Tredegar  for the ‘Chelsea Opera Week’ in November.[17]

But Katharine was at times adrift from reality. It had not helped her well bring that her daughter Gwyneth had died in mysterious circumstances  between December 1924 and May 1925, and a body ( identified as Gwyneth) had been dragged out of the River Thames. 

TO BE CONTINUED


EXTRACT FROM THE DRAFT OF A BOOK " THE FIVE LADY TREDEGARS"  BY WILLIAM CROSS, FSA SCOT


FOR MORE INFORMATION  E-MAIL WILL CROSS

williecross@aol.com


[1] Daily Mail, 26 December 1913

[2] Western Mail, 22 January 1915.

[3] Ibid.

[4] The Exeter and Plymouth Gazette for 24 July, 1923 records “ Lord and Lady Tredegar have taken St Dunstan’s Lodge, Regent’s Park for a short term.”

[5] Manchester Evening News, 29 March,  1915. According to this report  the house was sold by Lord Tredegar to Lord Londesborough, who entertained the Kaiser and Kaiserin. In 1915 the house was owned by Mr Otto Kahn.

[6] The Morgan townhouse in London of 39 Portman Place was put to the market to meet the death duties from Godfrey’s estate.  In 1914  the Tredegars took a lease on Lady Millar’s house at 45 Grosvenor Square.

[7] Western Mail, 18 August 1914.

[8]  Daily Mirror, 27 June, 1917.

[9]  Ibid..

[10] Daily Mirror, 26 November, 1917.

[11] Daily Mirror 11 May 1918.

[12] Daily Mirror 14 February 1918

[13]  Daily Mirror 18 March, 1918.

[14] Reviewed in The Telegraph for 15 April,   1918.

[15]    The Times of 23 April, 1921 records Katharine attending Wyndham’s Lewis’ ‘ Tyros and Portraits’ at the Leicester Galleries. Other named as attending include Lady Cunard , Mr Asquith and Sir Carl and Lady Meyer.

[16]  Daily Telegraph, 14 March 1921.

[17] Daily Telegraph  11 November , 1926.


Wednesday, 11 June 2025

Remembering Robin Bryans / Robert Harbinson : 1928-2005

 Remembering Robin Bryans / Robert Harbinson : 1928-2005



Robin Bryans : Ulsterman and Author

A kindly thought today, twenty years since the passing of this controversial author, on the 11 June 2005.

He was an Ulsterman, a poet, travel writer and a thorn in the Establishment’s side.

The extraordinary legacy of this complex and often sadly twisted man, the creator of four scandal ringing volumes of autobiography, often referred to as the 'Conspiracy Theorists Bible', although rambling, is quite a marvel.

Despite the repeated tirades of “ I Accuse” his writings offer a mostly coherent account of his often bohemian life and times and ranks as a compelling black monument to the upper crust, and the seedier side of many well known politicians, publishers, judges, and lawyers of the mid late 20th century.

Fantasist, maybe, but I more than just fancy there are grains of wheat to be found within the chaff, my many years of researches into Bryans various claims proved a perpetual minefield.

Bryans published as Robin Bryans four  remarkable memoirs under the Honeyford Press imprint: The dust has never settled (1992); Let the petals fall (1993), resembling a sequel to a book called  The protégé  from the 1960s, with many digressions. There was also Checkmate: the memories of a political prisoner (1994); and Blackmail and whitewash (1996).

I am indebted to Bryans without whom I could not have written my biographies of Evan Morgan, Viscount Tredegar, in particular " Not Behind Lace Curtains" : The Hidden World of Evan, Viscount Tredegar " ( 2013).

A well written, considerate, and longer narrative on Bryans can be found in the Dictionary of Irish Biography



Sunday, 25 May 2025

HON. GWYNETH ERICKA MORGAN : A 100 YEAR OLD MYSTERY

 


POOR GWYNETH

A CENTURY OF COVER UP  

Today, in 1925
A Body!


100 years ago today, on 25th May 1925, around 6am, about half a mile from London’s Tower Bridge, a routine police boat was patrolling the River Thames. In the very same spot, the lifeless body of young boy who had fallen from off a barge was recovered a few hours before.

Towards Pocock Wharf at Wapping, the tidal displacement brought another body to the surface. The object was moving with the action of the waves. After some delicate manoeuvring, it was brought on board. At first, the officers believed it was the corpse of a man for the hair had been rotted away by its long submersion in the water. The clothing, a mackintosh coat was saturated with mud and disintegrated when touched. Some underwear was discernible as was a shoe attached to one foot. It was the body of a woman. Another report mentions that it had been lying in only five feet of water. It was in an advanced state of decomposition. The facial features were unrecognisable.

During the day, this part of the Thames was one of the nosiest and busiest channels on the River. Here several large steamers were anchored, along with numerous barges. At night time and in the early dawn it was quieter stretch with only the gentle tapping of the waves to be heard as the occasional tug passed along.

Sergeant William Mathers took charge of the body and the boat made for the riverfront.

The rotting remains were taken to Old Church Stairs and then onto the mortuary at Rotherhithe. Here they were later examined by a police surgeon, Dr Fox at 7.45am. Into the afternoon and the evening of the same day, the attachments to the body were studied closely. These particulars were to form part of the crucial evidence leading to putting a name to the corpse.

The garments were fragile the fragments of clothing, were considerably decayed. The first clue as to identity was that one of the under-garments. This had a laundry tag bearing the name of G.E.Morgan; the second clue was a brown shoe, and the third clue was some jewellery around the victim’s neck, two chains, one silver, one gold, the first of these a turquoise pendant, in the form of a bird, which had been broken in several places and mended, the gold chain had a small cross.

For five months, the name of Hon Gwyneth Morgan had been in newspaper headlines across Britain and overseas. There had been a widespread search for her, and when it was apparent that the disappearance was not one of Gwyneth’s pranks, including earlier disappearances when she had informed no one of her plans, her father, Lord Tredegar offered a reward for any information.

Was the mystery of Gwyneth Morgan who had disappeared on 11 December 1924 from a house in Wimbledon, now solved?

The newspapers reported it was. But what is the truth?

Welsh writers, Monty Dart and Will Cross spent 7 years reconstructing the events that led to the discovery of the body - assumed to be Gwyneth's- in the process they were warned to leave matters alone. The terrifying truth was plain, Gwyneth's death - whenever it took place- was a crime, a crime that even now 100 years on remains covered up.

Poor Gwyneth!

Monty and Will's book " A BEAUTIFUL NUISANCE" : THE LIFE AND DEATH OF THE HONOURABLE GWYNETH ERICKA MORGAN" is still available.

CONTACT THE AUTHOR WILL CROSS

 

williecross@aol.com

 




Tuesday, 20 May 2025

POOR GWYNETH : THE LIFE AND DEATH OF A WELSH HEIRESS DEEMED A BEAUTIFUL NUISANCE

                              


A TALK TODAY AT PONYTYPOOL, SOUTH WALES

ON THE HONOURABLE GWYNETH ERICKA MORGAN

Hon. Gwyneth Ericka Morgan : ‘ A Beautiful Nuisance’

A Crime Revisited 100 Years On : From William Cross, FSA Scot

“..and all that’s best of dark and light meet in her aspect and her eyes” Byron

Hon. Gwyneth Ericka Morgan: 1895-1925 was one of the richest and as a debutante of 1914, one of the prettiest and alluring of girls. The daughter of Lord Courtenay and Lady Katharine Tredegar of Tredegar House, Newport, and, only sibling of the notorious Evan Morgan, the last Viscount Tredegar.

Gwyneth was wayward and unpredictable. She had an adventurous streak and a reputation for being something of a bohemian in the era of the ‘Bright Young Things’. After a chequered childhood, WW1 & difficult struggle in her 20s and after a period of foreign travel including recuperating from ill health Gwyneth suddenly walked out of a house in Wimbledon on 11 December 1924 where she lived with a housekeeper & maid. She left in a thick London fog with £70 in her pocket. She told no one where she was going. After being missing for five months a rotting corpse, was pulled from the River Thames on 25 May 1925. It was claimed as Gywneth’s. But was it? Who benefited by clearing up Gwyneth’s fate?

We'll never really know for sure what happened to Gwyneth Morgan. After spending 7 years investigating her disappearance her biographers Will Cross and Monty Dart in the book " A Beautiful Nuisance : The Life and Death of the Honourable Gwyneth Ericka Morgan " reached various conclusions but never found finality or peace of mind.

"One of the saddest things about Gwyneth's death" "was the turquoise amulet found on her body. It had been given to her by her brother Evan ( perhaps to ward off evil influences ) , it was held together by a piece of wire from a ginger beer bottle. It must have meant a lot to her."

Today, in May 2025 as we near the centenary of Gwyneth’s re-emergence after a mystery disappearance, and over 5 months of searching and waiting for news Will Cross offers some new evidence he’s gathered behind the whole mystery but still with some unanswered questions , yet sinister overtones.

A small number of copies of the biography of Gwyneth, featured below are still available, reduced to £13.20 (plus UK postage) on ebay, but only for a few days and then the book will wither (like Gwyneth) on the vine.

ENQUIRIES  : PLEASE CONTACT WILL CROSS BY EMAIL :

 

williecross@aol.com

 


POSTED 21 MAY 2025


Wednesday, 7 May 2025

TOM MITFORD BIOGRAPHY : A FEARFUL OLD TWISTER

 

Click On Image For Full View Of The Book

TOM MITFORD 1909-1945

A FEARFUL OLD TWISTER

The only brother of the outrageous Mitford Sisters

Nancy, Pam, Diana, Unity, Jessica and Deborah

Tom was a beloved son and brother, a barrister, soldier and lover of both sexes. He was killed in Burma fighting the Japanese on 30 March 1945, aged 36

A FULL LENGTH BIOGRAPHY OF TOM FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE BY WILLIAM CROSS FSA, SCOT

The best way of buying the book is on ebay - click on the link below -  or  enquire direct from the Author William Cross  via his email contact address


 

williecross@aol.com

 

 



Top: Tom Mitford in 1931
Bottom : Tom With His Sisters 1935




THE MITFORDS




Monday, 3 March 2025

DENNISTOUN V DENNISTOUN RECALLED FROM 1925

 

 


Dennistoun v Dennistoun

Kings Bench Division, High Court, 1925

“The Dustbin Case”

 Dorothy Dennistoun brought a Civil Court action against her former husband, Ian Dennistoun, a retired Army officer, to recover £1300 she advanced him for bills and loans during their marriage. She also claimed damages for breach of a verbal contract for maintenance.

 The Dennistouns married in 1910 but divorced in 1921. Dorothy was persuaded not to seek maintenance.  Ian said he’d make provision, if he could, at a later date.   In 1920, Dorothy met Almina, Lady Carnarvon through General John Cowans, quartermaster of the British Army during WW1 and a close friend of the Dennistouns.  Later, Ian met Almina, whose husband discovered Tutankhamen’s tomb and famously died from a mosquito-bite in April 1923. Almina and Ian fell in love.

Almina deposited large amounts of money into Ian’s bank account during 1922-3.  Ian repaid Dorothy £500.  She reminded him what amount was owed.  Later, he left an envelope addressed with her pet name “Brown Mouse” containing £100. By September 1923, Dorothy wanted full repayment.  Ian refused to discuss matters except through his solicitors. Meanwhile, Almina installed him in a flashy London apartment, and then in December 1923 they married.

During 1924 no progress was made to settle with Dorothy. On 3 March 1925 The Dustbin Case (said Punch) came before Mr. Justice McCardie.  Sir Ellis Hume-Williams KC representing Dorothy, Sir Edward Marshall Hall KC for Ian. It lasted 17 sordid days, rocking the Establishment, destroying many reputations.

Dorothy was named mistress of General John Cowans.  She claimed she’d only been intimate with him to secure advancement for Ian in the Army.  Cowans  - a legend – had died in 1921 – and was given a State funeral.

There was mudslinging all-round. Dorothy’s team claimed she’d been intimidated by claims about her misconduct. Ian’s team described Dorothy as a blackmailer misusing private letters written by him ( pet name “Tiger” ).

The case dominated newspaper headlines for weeks. Well-dressed women camped in the Strand to visit the Court scene. The King wrote to the Lord Chancellor of his  “disgust and shame” about the case.


Edward Marshall Hall – who’d misguidedly taken the brief as a friend of Ian - lost control of his attacks on Dorothy, she remained cool throughout 14 hours of cross-examination.  Her immorality was exposed with many lovers named.  One, a Spaniard, Bolin (with whom she fell pregnant and was to marry) was cited as the true reason for divorcing Dennistoun.  And that Dorothy had only taken the proceedings as Ian’s new wife was very rich and was sure she’d want to settle out of Court.

 

It was said “ Tiger” Dennistoun was fully aware and encouraged Dorothy’s liaisons with Cowans.  Ian’s appointments between 1913-17 were orchestrated by Cowans, first as a favour, then only for sex.   In 1916, Ian visited the Ritz Hotel, Paris ahead of Cowans seducing Dorothy to ensure everything was laid-on.

 

Dorothy impressed the Jury who awarded her £5000 damages. The Judge said this was inconsistent with the law. He gave judgement in favour of Dorothy’s claims for only £472.18 ruling “there was no binding agreement to support her.”  The case incurred ten-of-thousands of pounds in costs and lawyers’ fees, neither party saved face.

 

Interestingly it was the last divorce case of endless dirty-washing being hung out in public.  Despite a strong protest campaign by the Press, Parliament passed the Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926 prohibiting the detailed reporting of divorce cases in newspapers.

MORE INFORMATION CONTACT WILLIAM CROSS

COPIES OF THE BOOK ARE STILL AVAILABLE FROM WILL


williecross@aol.com

 

 

 

 

DENNISTOUN v DENNISTOUN REMEMBERED FROM 1925

 

 



Dennistoun v Dennistoun

Kings Bench Division, High Court, 1925

“The Dustbin Case”

 Dorothy Dennistoun brought a Civil Court action against her former husband, Ian Dennistoun, a retired Army officer, to recover £1300 she advanced him for bills and loans during their marriage. She also claimed damages for breach of a verbal contract for maintenance.

The Dennistouns married in 1910 but divorced in 1921. Dorothy was persuaded not to seek maintenance.  Ian said he’d make provision, if he could, at a later date.   In 1920, Dorothy met Almina, Lady Carnarvon through General John Cowans, quartermaster of the British Army during WW1 and a close friend of the Dennistouns.  Later, Ian met Almina, whose husband discovered Tutankhamen’s tomb and famously died from a mosquito-bite in April 1923. Almina and Ian fell in love.

Almina deposited large amounts of money into Ian’s bank account during 1922-3.  Ian repaid Dorothy £500.  She reminded him what amount was owed.  Later, he left an envelope addressed with her pet name “Brown Mouse” containing £100. By September 1923, Dorothy wanted full repayment.  Ian refused to discuss matters except through his solicitors. Meanwhile, Almina installed him in a flashy London apartment, and then in December 1923 they married.

During 1924 no progress was made to settle with Dorothy. On 3 March 1925 The Dustbin Case (said Punch) came before Mr. Justice McCardie.  Sir Ellis Hume-Williams KC representing Dorothy, Sir Edward Marshall Hall KC for Ian. It lasted 17 sordid days, rocking the Establishment, destroying many reputations.

Dorothy was named mistress of General John Cowans.  She claimed she’d only been intimate with him to secure advancement for Ian in the Army.  Cowans  - a legend – had died in 1921 – and was given a State funeral.

There was mudslinging all-round. Dorothy’s team claimed she’d been intimidated by claims about her misconduct. Ian’s team described Dorothy as a blackmailer misusing private letters written by him ( pet name “Tiger” ).

The case dominated newspaper headlines for weeks. Well-dressed women camped in the Strand to visit the Court scene. The King wrote to the Lord Chancellor of his  “disgust and shame” about the case.





Edward Marshall Hall – who’d misguidedly taken the brief as a friend of Ian - lost control of his attacks on Dorothy, she remained cool throughout 14 hours of cross-examination.  Her immorality was exposed with many lovers named.  One, a Spaniard, Bolin (with whom she fell pregnant and was to marry) was cited as the true reason for divorcing Dennistoun.  And that Dorothy had only taken the proceedings as Ian’s new wife was very rich and was sure she’d want to settle out of Court.

 

It was said “ Tiger” Dennistoun was fully aware and encouraged Dorothy’s liaisons with Cowans.  Ian’s appointments between 1913-17 were orchestrated by Cowans, first as a favour, then only for sex.   In 1916, Ian visited the Ritz Hotel, Paris ahead of Cowans seducing Dorothy to ensure everything was laid-on.

 

Dorothy impressed the Jury who awarded her £5000 damages. The Judge said this was inconsistent with the law. He gave judgement in favour of Dorothy’s claims for only £472.18 ruling “there was no binding agreement to support her.”  The case incurred ten-of-thousands of pounds in costs and lawyers’ fees, neither party saved face.

 

Interestingly it was the last divorce case of endless dirty-washing being hung out in public.  Despite a strong protest campaign by the Press, Parliament passed the Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926 prohibiting the detailed reporting of divorce cases in newspapers. 


 

 

 

The Dustbin Case

 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION  CONTACT WILLIAM CROSS. COPIES OF THE BOOK ARE STILL AVAILABLE FROM WILL. EMAIL BELOW

 williecross@aol.com